[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: Backported drivers



Please read this as "I have decided against pushing new hardware support to stable branch"

Thanks,
Sarvesh

-----Original Message-----
From: Bandi,Sarveshwar [mailto:Sarveshwar.Bandi@Emulex.Com] 
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 3:44 PM
To: Ben Hutchings
Cc: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: Backported drivers

Ben,
   I have decided pushing new hardware support to stable branch. Given the dependencies of the patches on intermediate wants I don’t want to take the risk of regressing. If there are any other criticial patches I will certainly push them into stable.
  As for 3.9, while new hardware support was available certain critical patches in relation to that went in after 3.9 cut was made. I will open bug again 3.9.5-1 and submit these patches

Thanks,
Sarvesh

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:ben@decadent.org.uk]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 7:26 AM
To: Bandi,Sarveshwar
Cc: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Backported drivers

On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 07:27 +0000, Bandi,Sarveshwar wrote:
> Ben,
>    I would like to backport patches into 3.9 (support for new hardware 
> and critical bugs). Can I do it now? Or when is the right time to do 
> it?

Critical bug fixes should be submitted for inclusion in kernel.org stable branches.  And backporting new hardware support to unstable outside of a freeze period is generally unnecessary, as each new upstream release will quickly be uploaded there.

If you really want to provide a tested backport from net-next to 3.9 then I'm not about to refuse your patches.  But it would help many more Debian users if you would concentrate on backporting to our stable release.

Ben.

--
Ben Hutchings
friends: People who know you well, but like you anyway.

Reply to: