Re: Linux 3.2 in wheezy
Ben Hutchings <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> (See the complaints about removing OpenVZ in wheezy despite 4 years'
> advance notice of this.)
There were complaints when this was originally decided four years ago by
the kernel team. What is disturbing is that the complaints then (lxc is
not even close to being a drop-in replacement for Linux-Vservers) are
still true now. When I said this four years ago, I was somewhat placated
by the fact that there was a long period of time still remaining that
could result in lxc becoming a good replacement... now that we are
getting closer to the wire, its becoming more obvious that this is not
going to be the case.