[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#656331: r8169 with ASUS M2A-VM (SB600): Network device stays down after resume



On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 16:32 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 18.01.2012, 15:03 +0000 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> > On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 15:15 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > > Package: linux-2.6
> > > Version: 3.1.8-2
> > > Severity: normal
> 
> > > suspending and resuming a lot, it happens once to me, that the network
> > > device did not come back correctly.
> > [...]
> > 
> > Some of the RTL81xx gigabit Ethernet controllers need a firmware patch
> > to be reliable.  I can't tell whether you have one of these.  Are there
> > any kernel log messages about requesting a firmware file for the NIC?
> > If so, does installing firmware-realtek fix the problem?
> 
> There are no Linux messages requesting the firmware.

OK.

> And not being able
> to trigger I probably just have to wait that it happens again. Can I
> increase some log level to capture more information next time? Or since
> this could be a firmware bug Linux cannot do anything about this?

No, it's probably something that can be fixed in the driver.

> $ dmesg | grep -i firmware
> $ dmesg | grep 8169
> [    1.109369] r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.3LK-NAPI loaded
> [    1.109417] r8169 0000:02:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
> [    1.109452] r8169 0000:02:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [    1.109511] r8169 0000:02:00.0: irq 41 for MSI/MSI-X
> [    1.110094] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: RTL8168b/8111b at 0xffffc90000364000, 00:1e:8c:aa:1d:b5, XID 18000000 IRQ 41
[...]

Right, this variant doesn't need a firmware patch.

Please can you re-send your bug report to:
Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@realtek.com>, Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
and cc:
netdev@vger.kernel.org, 656331@bugs.debian.org

Be sure to include the log messages from your second mail.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: