On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 13:35 +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Faheem Mitha wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > >> I think this is just too much detail for this section. If you think > >> it's necessary to explain ABI maintenance in this much detail, that > >> probably belongs in a new chapter. > > > Ok. Well, feel free to take it out then. In any case, I hope you will > > apply some version of this patch. Let me know if I can do anything else. > > I don't know what new chapter you have in mind, but I suggest applying the > patch for now (if it seems Ok with you) with the excessive detail about > the ABI removed and we can talk about it further if you wish, See version 1.0.10. By the way, there is a separate list for kernel-handbook at email@example.com, though I'm not sure whether it should remain a separate list. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part