Bug#604096: Bug#601341: Bug#602418: #601341, #602418 and #604096 seem to be duplicates
> Then I got to eba164ec7e69 "radeon/nouveau/ttm/AGP: Use dma_addr if TTM
> has set it." which complained:
> CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_agp_backend.o
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_agp_backend.c: In function ‘ttm_agp_populate’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_agp_backend.c:66: error: ‘struct agp_memory’ has no member named ‘dma_addr’
> and indeed the field is missing both in 2.6.32+drm33 and Linus' tree. Do
> I need to cherry pick something from another series or is this commit
You can drop that patch. I've rebased the tree to:
devel/ttm.pci-api-v2
which is exactly like the older except missing that patch.
> something which should be ignored per our previous discussion about PCIe
> vs AGP etc? (I'm going with the second option for now)
Yup.
>
> I'll publish my backport in a git tree once I'm happy with it, I need to
> tidy it up and correct the cherry-picked from comments etc and then
> actually build something which uses it. I'll make Debian packages
> available for wider testing once I've done that (with Xmas coming up I
> don't know when that will actually be).
>
> Did the series make any waves upstream? What are the chances that it
> will go upstream in something roughly like its current form?
I hope so. I am putting the polishing touches on item c) to have it ready for upstream.
Reply to: