[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PATA transition



elendil@planet.nl wrote:

>I don't think the first would be a very good idea as it means that we'll 
>still not be rid of the IDE drivers. It seems better to concentrate the
Indeed. Please remember that udev has at least a couple of open bugs
about things like persistent links breaking with the IDE drivers, which
obviously nobody cares about because other distributions stopped using
IDE drivers long ago.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


Reply to: