Re: 2.6.26-5 vs m68k atari abi
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 08:04:21AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:48:53AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:36:17PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 01:02:01PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 03:45:13PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 07:56:21AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > > > > It looks like the CONFIG_LBD=n change caused an abi change on m68k
> > > > > > atari. (Seems obvious now, but I didn't run into this problem with
> > > > > > the build test.)
> > > >
> > > > > > How do I fix this?
> > > > >
> > > > > add an ignore gfs2_* pattern as i doubt that this in high use on m68k.
> > > >
> > > > I agree, where does this pattern go?
> > >
> > > see config/hppa/defines for an example
> >
> > Thanks, now I understand.
> >
> > Unfortunately, it looks like a number of other symbols were changed too.
> > I don't suppose I'm allowed to ignore_changes: *? ;)
> >
> > So how do I proceed? Bump the abi or ignore the differences?
> >
> > This kernel is not widely distributed yet. Not making the change
> > causes a double fault in the general use case of the atari kernel
> > under aranym with debian-installer. (Pretty much the only thing keeping
> > me from running daily regression tests with d-i.)
>
> Could someone give me a pointer on how to update the abi for m68k? So
> far the only thing I've managed to get to work is "ignore_changes: *",
> which I'm guessing someone will fuss about if I commit. ;)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen
no you are the maintainer, go for it.
--
maks
Reply to: