[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 2.6.26-5 vs m68k atari abi



On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:48:53AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:36:17PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 01:02:01PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 03:45:13PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 07:56:21AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > > > It looks like the CONFIG_LBD=n change caused an abi change on m68k
> > > > > atari. (Seems obvious now, but I didn't run into this problem with 
> > > > > the build test.)
> > > 
> > > > > How do I fix this?
> > > > 
> > > > add an ignore gfs2_* pattern as i doubt that this in high use on m68k.
> > > 
> > > I agree, where does this pattern go?
> > 
> > see config/hppa/defines for an example
> 
> Thanks, now I understand.
> 
> Unfortunately, it looks like a number of other symbols were changed too.
> I don't suppose I'm allowed to ignore_changes: *? ;)
> 
> So how do I proceed? Bump the abi or ignore the differences? 
> 
> This kernel is not widely distributed yet. Not making the change 
> causes a double fault in the general use case of the atari kernel 
> under aranym with debian-installer. (Pretty much the only thing keeping
> me from running daily regression tests with d-i.)

Could someone give me a pointer on how to update the abi for m68k? So
far the only thing I've managed to get to work is "ignore_changes: *",
which I'm guessing someone will fuss about if I commit. ;)

Thanks,

Stephen

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<stephen@marenka.net>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: