Quoting Justin B Rye (jbr@edlug.org.uk): > > "linux tree" is incorrect, imho. That's the Linux kernel source tree, > > I think > > RHCS isn't Section: devel, so it would be good if it could avoid > this jargon - only dogs and programmers do things against trees. In case you don't read blogs, that one made my day. Please just imagine myself alone hacking at 07:00am in my daily train to work and suddenly laughing out loud and looking silly to other train apssengers, *because of you*..:-) > Unfortunately I'm not confident I can translate "compiling an > out-of-tree module against a source tree" into English... We should some day invent an en_US@geek locale... Otherwise, as usual, all suggestions adopted (unless I forgot some: I usually apply changes manually).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature