Re: Towards consensus of our usage of the Uploaders field
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:59:36AM +0200, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:32:29PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > According to policy 5.6.3:
> >
> > List of the names and email addresses of co-maintainers of the
> > package, if any. If the package has other maintainers beside the one
> > named in the Maintainer field, their names and email addresses should
> > be listed here.
> >
> > Given this, I believe anyone on the kernel team should be permitted an
> > entry in the Uploaders field. I also do not believe that the presence
> > of a maintainer's name in the Uploaders field grants them any
> > additional privileges. Uploads still need to be coordinated on the
> > mailing list, etc.
> >
> > Does this match other people's interpretations? Let's please use this
> > thread to achieve consensus on Uploaders usage.
>
> I do agree with this interpretation. I also think it's really sad that
> we have to invoke policy to regulate the use of the Uploaders field.
> There is no reason whatsoever (other than Bastian's anti-social
> tendencies) to keep people out of Uploaders if they think/feel that
> they should be there.
So, will you try to expulse him too, like Frederik and Andres did to me ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: