Re: which kernel version for etch?
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:36:06PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:35:56PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > Hello Sven,
> >
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:02:29AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > I am little interested in
> > > going this way, if it means another flamewar between me and the d-i team, with
> > > everyone else watching silently.
> > >
> > > Andreas Barth, you claimed that you could see strong reason not to go this
> > > way, please could you comment on them now in this thread.
> >
> > Please let's keep this problem you and some other developers have with
> > each other out of here. IMHO it has reached a point where only personal
> > mediation could help, and every additional word lost on it here or on
> > IRC will just make it worse.
>
> Huh ? What has this to do with this ? Andreas told us on irc that he knew of
> several serious reasons why we should not merge the .udebs into the linux-2.6
> package. I am just asking that he don't keep those reasons secret, but tell
> them to us here.
>
> Is that also too much to ask ?
>
> > Sven: I would like you to not partecipate in any discussion concerning
> > d-i or kernel udebs - at least as long as you use that very contribution
> > to raise this issue again and again.
>
> Well, i am seriously interested in knowing what reservations Andreas had, that
> he mentioned on irc, and have asked him now a couple of times to state them. I
> believe that this information he has and seems unwilling to share for some
> obscure reason, do indeed belong to this thread.
Oh well, it seems after all, Andreas Barth had no reservations, but only some
second hand objections from the d-i team. Andreas, why didn't you say so the
first time then ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: