On Mar 14, martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org> wrote: > also sprach Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> [2006.03.14.2030 +0100]: > > And if something breaks a script which works with bash, dash and a > > modern busybox then it fits pretty well my definiton of brokeness. > the code in ide.agent is one massive hack. it's not posix afaict. > thus, no shell is broken if it cannot execute it flawlessly. I think that it is very reasonable code and I verified that it works even with posh. I doubt that it is not at least a valid XSI script, but even if it were not I would not care since it passes the "reasonable Bourne shell" test. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature