Re: Bug#345067: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:55:48 +0100
Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:58:58AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Version: 0.0.12-5
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:51:22 +0100
> > Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> >
> > > Notice that on wednesday, this bug will be open since 3 month, if
> > > i am not wrong,
> >
> > Ah - for some reason my bug-closing hint in changelog was ignored.
> > How very annoying...
>
> BTW, thanks for not crediting the research i did in the changelog
> entry, and only mentioning Jurij, and then publicly blaming me in the
> -6 changelog entry.
Your repeatitive pointing out what big a fool I am gave me the
impression that you yourself was handling your own credit.
If you are unaware of what I am talking about then have a look at this:
http://wiki.debian.org/LinuxKernelIdeProblem?action=diff&rev2=23&rev1=15
The issue is solved thanks to folks figuring out the kernel actually
behave and behaved earlier, not folks claiming that there is no problem.
- Jonas
P.S.
I know, I shouldn't even respond to a message like the above, feeding
this irrelevant non-technical fight. sorry - couldn't resist.
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
Attachment:
pgp84uVbvsHEZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Bug#345067: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#345067: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch
- From: Jurij Smakov <jurij@wooyd.org>
- Re: Bug#345067: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: Bug#345067: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch
- From: Anthony DeRobertis <aderobertis@metrics.net>
- Re: Bug#345067: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: Bug#345067: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch
- From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
- Re: Bug#345067: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: Bug#345067: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch
- From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
- Re: Bug#345067: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: Bug#345067: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch
- From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
- Re: Bug#345067: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>