On Saturday 05 February 2005 23:01, maximilian attems wrote: > 2.6.10 needs to be considered if time frame shifts. > 1/2 a year of kernel dev resulting in better hardware support > (acpi newer intel board) should not be thrown away too easily. I came across #291884 today, which blocks the unloading of unused (ide-)modules during a boot from initrd. The explanation for this is in [1]. I was wondering if this isn't something that reduces the desirability of 2.6.10 for Sarge. [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/1/6/23 Cheers, FJP
Attachment:
pgppxjphNXlu_.pgp
Description: PGP signature