Re: kernel-package and the build symlink ... I don't think we can continue to use k-p under current conditions.
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:44:12 +0100, Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> said:
> Hello, Well, i had now two consecutive days of lengthy chats with
> Manoj about this issue, and i hate to say it, but i don't think
> Manoj is ready to compromise on this and he failed to give any
> argument apart from this is the way he decided it in 96 and it has
> always been done so. A few short quotes to prove that point :
> These two show perfectly the real problem here, and there has been
> not a single technical argument in favour of his solution, and he
> just throwed away our own arguments.
Can we have some one who can acrtually follow a technical
argument take this up with me, please? Repeatedly demonstrating
common use cases and solutions to them have not worked with
Sven. I'll happily continue the discussion with anyone able to follow
along.
manoj
--
Machine-Independent, adj.: Does not run on any existing machine.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: