Re: Bug#333858: Proposed improved patch for yaird
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 05:32:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 01:54:25PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:51:43 +0200 Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:31:28AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > > > What do you think?
Let's see if I can summarise. I haven't actually used Alioth yet,
so please correct me if I suggest something impossible ...
Erik wants two separate projects for yaird-core and debian-subdir;
this is acceptable to both Sven and Jonas.
Jonas wants project stuff like mailing lists to be separate from
debian-kernel both for yaird-core and debian-subdir;
to Sven this is acceptable: the repo matters, not the list.
Sven wants at least debian-subdir to be part of kernel repo.
[ Hmm, with the Nordic names, this is starting to sound like
some scandinavian novel, where everyone spends at least 30 years
brooding ... we should be able to do better than that :-) ]
Can you both work with the following?
* there are two alioth projects: yaird-core and yaird-debian-subdir,
with mailing lists separate from debian-kernel.
* yaird-core has a repository separate from svn://svn.debian.org/kernel/
* yaird-debian-subdir is stored as part of the kernel repo, on the
understanding that unannounced breaking of stuff in the repo would be a
ground to move the debian-subdir repo elsewhere.
That would mean loss of history, and nobody wants that,
but lets be up front about what to do if this approach does not
work out.
Regards,
Erik
Reply to: