Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 01:09:59PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 06:45:13PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > I am, right at this moment, building 2.6.13-1.experimental.1, and
>
> This should be 2.6.13-0.experimental.1, which would be lower than 2.6.13-1
> which we would upload to unstable. Don't forget to make sure you include the
> .orig tarball though, as i don't think it is included in 0.experimental.1 by
> default.
That ought to be 2.6.13-0experimental1, otherwise various bits of the
archive maintenance software will treat it as a binary-only NMU in some
ways and get confused. I've made that mistake before ...
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@debian.org]
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...
- From: Jeff Bailey <jbailey@raspberryginger.com>
- Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...
- From: Horms <horms@debian.org>
- Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...
- From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
- Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...
- From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
- Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...
- From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
- Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...
- From: Horms <horms@debian.org>
- Re: 2.6.13, experimental and 2.6.14-rc ...
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>