Bug#311941: kernel-patch-debian-2.6.11: Package description says "patch does not apply to pristine sources", which doesn't seem to be the case
- To: dann frazier <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: email@example.com
- Subject: Bug#311941: kernel-patch-debian-2.6.11: Package description says "patch does not apply to pristine sources", which doesn't seem to be the case
- From: Johannes Rohr <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 21:19:58 +0200
- Message-id: <email@example.com>
- Reply-to: Johannes Rohr <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- In-reply-to: <1117905285.17908.14.camel@localhost>
- References: <E1DeXBb-0003Zf-NI@rudi.3linden> <1117905285.17908.14.camel@localhost>
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 11:14 -0600 schrieb dann frazier:
> They contain the differences between the
> kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11.orig.tar.gz and Debian's kernel sources. The
> important point here is that kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11.orig.tar.gz is
> not the same as linux-2.6.11.tar.gz. The differences are primarily due
> to the removal of non-redistributable files. These patches may apply
> cleanly to a vanilla linux tarball, but this is purely coincidental and
> not guaranteed.
Thanks for your clarification!
This means that at the moment there is no way to obtain a debian kernel
source tree short of downloading the kernel-source-2.*.orig.tar.gz.
For bandwidth impaired people like me this is quite unfortunate. When I
already have a linux-*.tar.bz2 on a CD from a computer magazine, I'm
happy about not having to download an additional 40 megs (takes about
two hours here!), especially when 40 K of diffs would also do the job.
So could the kernel team consider providing such diffs? (Doesn't have to
be as a .deb)
Thanks for your good work!