Bug#311941: kernel-patch-debian-2.6.11: Package description says "patch does not apply to pristine sources", which doesn't seem to be the case
- To: Johannes Rohr <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Cc: dann frazier <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Bug#311941: kernel-patch-debian-2.6.11: Package description says "patch does not apply to pristine sources", which doesn't seem to be the case
- From: Sven Luther <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 09:37:35 +0200
- Message-id: <20050605073734.GB17667@pegasos>
- Reply-to: Sven Luther <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <E1DeXBb-0003Zf-NI@rudi.3linden> <1117905285.17908.14.camel@localhost> <email@example.com>
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 09:19:58PM +0200, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 11:14 -0600 schrieb dann frazier:
> > They contain the differences between the
> > kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11.orig.tar.gz and Debian's kernel sources. The
> > important point here is that kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11.orig.tar.gz is
> > not the same as linux-2.6.11.tar.gz. The differences are primarily due
> > to the removal of non-redistributable files. These patches may apply
> > cleanly to a vanilla linux tarball, but this is purely coincidental and
> > not guaranteed.
> Thanks for your clarification!
> This means that at the moment there is no way to obtain a debian kernel
> source tree short of downloading the kernel-source-2.*.orig.tar.gz.
> For bandwidth impaired people like me this is quite unfortunate. When I
> already have a linux-*.tar.bz2 on a CD from a computer magazine, I'm
> happy about not having to download an additional 40 megs (takes about
> two hours here!), especially when 40 K of diffs would also do the job.
Well, the kernel-source-2.*.orig.tar.gz is obtained from the linux-*.tar.bz2
by runing the prune-non-free script on it, so you could do the exact same
thing we debian/kernel developers do, and run that script on the pristine
> So could the kernel team consider providing such diffs? (Doesn't have to
> be as a .deb)
No, since providing such a .diff result in distributing the undistributable
firmware. Juste use the prune script,