Re: Kernel Security Updates for Sarge
- To: Horms <horms@verge.net.au>
- Cc: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>, Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>, Andres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org>, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>, Norbert Tretkowski <nobse@debian.org>, Thibaut VARENE <varenet@debian.org>, dann frazier <dannf@debian.org>, Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>, Rob Radez <rob@osinvestor.com>, Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>, Jurij Smakov <jurij@wooyd.org>, Frederik Schüler <fschueler@gmx.net>, Guido Guenther <agx@debian.org>, Karsten Merker <merker@debian.org>, Thiemo Seufer <ths@debian.org>, Sven Luther <luther@debian.org>, Kyle McMartin <kyle@debian.org>, "Christian T. Steigies" <cts@debian.org>, Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>, LaMont Jones <lamont@debian.org>, Bdale Garbee <bdale@debian.org>, Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Kernel Security Updates for Sarge
- From: dann frazier <dannf@dannf.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 12:38:20 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1116182301.11015.5.camel@localhost>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050514023343.GB15301@verge.net.au>
- References: <[🔎] 20050512060848.GA12019@verge.net.au> <[🔎] 20050512145059.GA5041@kitenet.net> <[🔎] 1115918576.23048.61.camel@krebs.dannf> <[🔎] 20050513155357.GE32296@kitenet.net> <[🔎] 1116000895.8737.40.camel@localhost> <[🔎] 20050514023343.GB15301@verge.net.au>
On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 11:33 +0900, Horms wrote:
> I am not planing to include the CAN-2005-0449 fix in the security or r1
> update as I undersdand that ABI changes are highly problematic. I am
> willing to be convinced otherwise.
>
Oh, do ABI changes in packages on security.debian.org break d-i as well?
I figured it would continue pulling udebs from r0, giving us until r1 to
spin d-i. Is there a problem I'm not seeing?
--
dann frazier <dannf@dannf.org>
Reply to: