Re: Kernel Security Updates for Sarge

[Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>]

On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:38:20PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 11:33 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > I am not planing to include the CAN-2005-0449 fix in the security or r1
> > update as I undersdand that ABI changes are highly problematic. I am
> > willing to be convinced otherwise.

> Oh, do ABI changes in packages on security.debian.org break d-i as well?
> I figured it would continue pulling udebs from r0, giving us until r1 to
> spin d-i.  Is there a problem I'm not seeing?

I don't know of any reason why they would break d-i; and I also don't think
that putting off all ABI-breaking security fixes until etch is a very good
answer anyway.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature