[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Open a discussion about bug 253324



On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 12:13:41PM +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
> Alle 02:01, mercoledì 30 giugno 2004, Andres Salomon ha scritto:
> 
> > >> I want to "open" a discussion about this bug on the debian-kernel
> > >> mailing list:
> > >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=253224
> 
> > Heh, when I first saw this post, I was ready to agree w/ Herbert (feh,
> > unnecessary eyecandy). 
> 
> Same to me.
> 
> > Then I went to the page; the screenshots are 
> > impressive.
> 
> Yes! It will really helps the "debian desktop experience" IMHO.
> 
> > I'd be up for adding this sort of thing, as long as the 
> > impact to users who don't want it (in disk space, memory, and
> > processor cycles) is minimal.
> 
> The kernel patch is small, the userspace is trival and the media space is 1% 
> of e.g. kde-artworks eye candy stuff.
> 
> > I recently set up a Debian box for my mom, 
> > and she asked about all the obscure boot messages that come up; it would
> > be nice to have a graphical display that could hide all that.
> 
> Same to me here too, but instead of my mom, she was m girlfriend and a low 
> techie friend that bought a computer from me (debian-only obviously, no 
> double boot or such).
> 
> The low techie people I came across think that anything beside graphics are 
> "old computing" or recovery broken things... so a bootsplash help they to 
> trust the operating system (the computer as whole object from their point of 
> view).
> 
> Suse already has bootsplash (it seems that they pushed some developing in it 
> also), and debian is just a few patch away from it (mainly mkinitrd support 
> and a kernel-patch).
> 
> But if the debian-kernel team agree on not having bootsplash support, I will 
> be silent until I can make easy (not more word but patch bytes!) for your 
> team to add it.

I don't know if we agree, it was not even discussed, so thanks for your
input.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: