Re: Sarge TODO items
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 09:42:16PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 02:12:49PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > > Now, if arch had a bitkeeper gateway ...
> >
> > What would that do?
>
> Well, not really be usefull in the current plan, which is to hold only
> the debian part, but if there was a bitekeeper gateway, we could hold
> the whole kernel tree in it, and efficiently interact with the bitkeeper
> archive of upstream.
What's your defintion of efficient interaction? If we want a fork with
our patches kept forever just pulling in something from bitkeeper could
make life a little easier because it's very good as merging. But as
soon as you look at it from a two-way merging perspective any SCM will
suck badly if we start storing the whole tree.
Reply to: