Re: NMU: kernel
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 01:27:58PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > There is absolutely no point in having 10 archs recompile the kernels
> > just because the 11th arch needs a typo fix.
>
> How about consistency?
Consistency can be achieved by trying to migrate most stuff into the
kernel-source package, like it has been proposed, and also trying to
streamline the configuration files, like the proposal to have the common
stuff in a separate file, and the arch-dependent ones in arch-dependent
files, and work on this all together in a subversion repository on
alioth.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: