Re: NMU: kernel

To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: NMU: kernel
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 23:46:47 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040523214647.GA21527@lst.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] hhn03yygwf.fsf@theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de>
References: <1YAwv-76t-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <hhekpc91l0.fsf@alsvidh.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de> <20040522111707.GA14610@pegasos> <20040522180213.GQ11346@kalmia.hozed.org> <20040522191742.GA16966@deprecation.cyrius.com> <[🔎] hhn03yygwf.fsf@theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de>

On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 11:26:08PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> The various source packages are kept in different locations, and only
> come together in the archive itself.  A central repository would be
> nice - as long as it does not bear the restriction of allowing only
> one source package.

What's the problem with a single source package again?  Even if there
is a single source package we can apply "dangerous" patches
conditionally for selected architectures.  Although I'd like to avoid
that if remotely possible.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NMU: kernel
  - From: Jens Schmalzing <j.s@lmu.de>
- Re: NMU: kernel
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>

References:
- Re: NMU: kernel
  - From: Jens Schmalzing <jens.schmalzing@physik.uni-muenchen.de>

Prev by Date: Re: NMU: kernel
Next by Date: Re: Debian non-x86 kernel arches
Previous by thread: Re: NMU: kernel
Next by thread: Re: NMU: kernel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread