Re: NMU: kernel

To: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: NMU: kernel
From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 13:27:58 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040525172758.GA19129@scowler.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87k6z08ogq.fsf@mrvn.homelinux.org>
References: <1YAwv-76t-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <hhekpc91l0.fsf@alsvidh.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de> <20040522111707.GA14610@pegasos> <20040522180213.GQ11346@kalmia.hozed.org> <20040522191742.GA16966@deprecation.cyrius.com> <[🔎] hhn03yygwf.fsf@theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de> <[🔎] 20040523214647.GA21527@lst.de> <[🔎] 87k6z08ogq.fsf@mrvn.homelinux.org>

> There is absolutely no point in having 10 archs recompile the kernels
> just because the 11th arch needs a typo fix.

How about consistency?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NMU: kernel
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>

References:
- Re: NMU: kernel
  - From: Jens Schmalzing <jens.schmalzing@physik.uni-muenchen.de>
- Re: NMU: kernel
  - From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
- Re: NMU: kernel
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>