Re: [wli@holomorphy.com: Re: NMU: kernel]
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 05:26:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther (sven.luther@wanadoo.fr) [040524 16:10]:
> > On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:42:46AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > > > Given that everyone extremly dislikes the single source package scheme
>
> > > Well, if you're taking a poll, count me in favor of single source
> > > package.
>
> > Single source packages are nice, but not practical in the debian case. I
> > guess you will have uploads multiplied by 12 or so compared to today, if
> > you want to keep the reactivity that is possible today.
>
> Well, even if it is not possible to do a single source package, we
> should IMHO really be able to reduce the number of source packages in
> sarge to 0-1 for 2.2, 2 for 2.4 and 2 for 2.6. Of course, this means
> major work after we decided which kernel version should be released
> with, but I really think it's worth, because it makes it much easier
> for the security team.
Yes, i agree with you, but this is fully orthogonal to what is currently
discussed here, at least this is how i understand this.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: