Re: [wli@holomorphy.com: Re: NMU: kernel]

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Subject: Re: [wli@holomorphy.com: Re: NMU: kernel]
From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 09:42:46 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040524134246.GA32211@scowler.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040524082700.GA29853@lst.de>
References: <1YCHQ-th-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <1YD1k-Gu-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <1YDaT-Ng-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <1YDXk-1tZ-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <1YEgG-1IQ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <[🔎] hhhdu87g5t.fsf@alsvidh.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de> <[🔎] 20040522134130.GA29202@infradead.org> <[🔎] 20040524082619.GH30382@pegasos> <[🔎] 20040524082700.GA29853@lst.de>

> Given that everyone extremly dislikes the single source package scheme

Well, if you're taking a poll, count me in favor of single source
package.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wli@holomorphy.com: Re: NMU: kernel]
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>

References:
- Re: [wli@holomorphy.com: Re: NMU: kernel]
  - From: Jens Schmalzing <j.s@lmu.de>
- Re: [wli@holomorphy.com: Re: NMU: kernel]
  - From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
- Re: [wli@holomorphy.com: Re: NMU: kernel]
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: [wli@holomorphy.com: Re: NMU: kernel]
  - From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>