Arjan van de Ven wrote: [snip] > > Does this mean to put all of 2.6 support in a single package? I don't > > think such an approach works well for architectures maintained outside > > the mainline (linus/morton) tree. > > Such architectures are really on the wrong track imo. They are also a pain > for any kernel maintainer, including the arch maintainers themselves. Afaics > all major architectures are uptodate in 2.6, Debian doesn't only care about the major architectures. > and given how fast architecture > updates get merged I see no real valid excuse for an architecture to be > maintained externally. Maybe I'm missing something, and if so, please > enlighten me. I'm more interested in facts than in "valid excuses". The MIPS 2.6.6 diff is currently 2 MB, with parts of it not ready for upstream. The 2.4.26 is 1 MB. I don't see the 2.6 situation changing soon. Thiemo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature