Re: Debian kernel maintainter takeover
On Mon, 17 May 2004 21:23:58 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine
<frankie@debian.org> said:
> On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 01:44:43PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
>>
>> I'm just looking at arch. It seems to be better than CVS - I never
>> liked the version tracking since it was per file. :)
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion - arch seems better than CVS.
>>
> Mmm, what's better among subversion and arch?
Well, this is highly subjective, but subversion is still a
CVS with a few bandaid fixes, and still is centralized; on IRC i
keep hearing about commits that did not go through (somthing I
never5 hear about arch). Arch is a whole new distributed
development SCM system.
manoj
--
perl5.004 -wMMath::BigInt -e'$^V=new
Math::BigInt+qq;$^F$^W783$[$%9889$^F47$|887
68$^W596577669$%$^W5$^F3364$[$^W$^F$|838747$[8889739$%$|$^F673$%$^W98$^F76777$=5
do{print+chr$^V%$^U;$^V/=$^U}while$^V!=$^W' Abigail
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: