Re: Debian kernel maintainter takeover
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 01:44:43PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
>
> I'm just looking at arch. It seems to be better than CVS - I never liked
> the version tracking since it was per file. :)
>
> Thanks for the suggestion - arch seems better than CVS.
>
Mmm, what's better among subversion and arch?
>
> You see I want to know what patches are applied to the vanilla kernel to
> make the vanilla kernel a Debian kernel. Furthermore, I also want to
> know where these patches are from (ie. from whom) and for what purpose.
>
I agree, having a decent tracking of what patches are used on d-kernels
and why, is a good point.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Reply to: