Re: Why is Konqueror part of `kde-baseapps`

To: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why is Konqueror part of `kde-baseapps`
From: Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 06:20:54 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 27227ff2-2b26-c6da-e8dd-f73a9f40a455@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] _VjbHRmJdKw0ELORYfmkDq-VxXmY-FUtryU3IoEH-riprXjewsWlW1ytT4mSM1UrpHRzG15fXPzS-i0PjNv06g3DLvZwZDR--a4rPdvOckU=@dumbledore.se>
References: <[🔎] _VjbHRmJdKw0ELORYfmkDq-VxXmY-FUtryU3IoEH-riprXjewsWlW1ytT4mSM1UrpHRzG15fXPzS-i0PjNv06g3DLvZwZDR--a4rPdvOckU=@dumbledore.se>

On 03/03/2018 02:59 AM, Albin Otterhäll wrote:

Hi!

Why is `konqueror`, `kwrite` and `keditbookmarks` part of the metapackage `kde-baseapps`? This seems to be packages that nobody needs or uses, but is part of all predefined metapackages (by being part of `kde-baseapps`).

I agree, unless you are planing on bringing back konquerorfile-management, dump it, it's useless.


Cheers,
--
Jimmy Johnson

Debian Buster - KDE Plasma 5.12.2 - AMD A8-7600 - EXT4 at sda7
Registered Linux User #380263

Reply to:

References:
- Why is Konqueror part of `kde-baseapps`
  - From: Albin Otterhäll <albin@dumbledore.se>

Prev by Date: Run script after resume from suspend
Next by Date: Is KTimeTracker defunct?
Previous by thread: Re: Why is Konqueror part of `kde-baseapps`
Next by thread: Re: Plasma 5: no more KDEHOME?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread