Hey, well very interesting, what you found :) The kolab team for the desktop team has two members christian and me. And am the only one you is reponsible for debian builds. But I never known about thiis https://ftp.kolab.org :) Thanks for this information, I'll check internally why these 3.5.X versions are (still) available. > Okay, there's the sources and the DSC files etc... I guess my > search was too specific. And to be honest, really, I had no idea > searching for 4.13. :) Yeah not a very happy time to start a stable branch. And the kolab version is as you see still in development, that's why there is no blog post about it. > I guess so. :-) Searching for success stories, most of the > related postings mention KDE 4.14 and Akonadi 1.13 (which is also > true for the OP's initial writings in [2]). So I think I would > not have gone for Akonadi 1.12.42.1, which is what I can find on > OBS (following your link), if you had not mentioned it. The version number for kolab is not that exact what it inside it :P There are many more features added, that we need and also backported bugfixes + own developed ones etc. But well the version we will ship, will be supported for some years and is going to customors the upcomming months. So I think we will have a stable solution and it is a though to use our version, if you fit into the usecases (imap, kolab resource,... ). Regads, sandro
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.