Hello, On sekmadienis 21 Kovas 2010 11:10:14 Valerio Passini wrote: > Alle sabato 20 marzo 2010, hai scritto: > > It all depends which "svn" he wants you to build: branches/KDE/4.4/ > > or trunk/KDE/. > > He asked me to build trunk SVN. :(. > > Sebastian Trueg wrote: "would you be willing to try svn trunk? And I > mean only the kdebase/runtime/nepomuk part of it..." Well, in order to build that "part", you will need: kdelibs >= 4.4.59 shared-desktop-ontologies >= 0.3.60 soprano >= 2.3.70 All these are development versions. One of the worst things about KDE is that despite being PITA by itself, it typically needs the latest devel versions of non-KDE packages. > > Just install newer KDE to different prefix. Also > > consider using kdesvn- build. However, it might be a bit tough to > > start&test that new KDE. > > I have read little about kdesvn-build. Do you think it's more suitable > to my needs than Alexandro Rojo's script? > > > Btw, I have plans to update packages up to kdebase from > > branches/KDE/4.4 today since they fix some nasty bugs I'm > > interested in. What is more, KDE SC 4.4.2 is going to be tagged in > > six days. qt-kde.debian.net users will probably get it shortly after > > tagging since it is not an official archive. > > So do you think it's worth for me to wait just a little, because the > fixes Sebastian is asking me to test will be present in the next > releases? That will be just wonderful. > Thank you so much. Ciao "Next releases" == 4.5.x ? It is a rather long wait and not a target for squeeze. Well, at this point it all depends solely on your willingness to mess with devel versions. Personally, I don't much experience building from svn directly. I always build packages. -- Modestas Vainius <modestas@vainius.eu>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.