[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Some about charsets and kmail

A Divendres 09 Març 2007 10:35, David Martínez Moreno va escriure:
> El viernes, 9 de marzo de 2007, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda escribió:
> > Hi,
> >
> > well this message is mainly for the people who as me, are living in a
> > world with accents and different characters in the occidental world. I'm
> > sure that people with different alphabet the situation is worst :-)
> >
> > I write mainly in three languages: Catalan, Spanish and English. My main
> > problems are in Catalan and Spanish with the accented chars and ç  ñ.
> >
> > I thought that I sent my messages using utf-8. Howeber I discovered that
> > it was not true. Although that in the kmail configuration, the editor
> > part, the charset, I have:
> > utf-8
> > utf-8(locale)
> > iso8859-15
> >
> > kmail sent message with the last one, I don't know why.
> >
> > Also, I have selected the box with maintain the charset in the replies if
> > is possible. Howeber I have found that I replied a message with utf-8
> > with iso8859-15, so the replied message is impossible so see ok because
> > the merge of charsets.
> >
> > There are also a  part in the configuration that I really don't
> > understand what does it means. In the appearance section the Message
> > window tab, there are two settings that I don't really understand:
> > Fallback character encoding
> > Override character encoding.
> 	Hola, Leo.
> 	I had a similar problem several months ago, and I found that KMail was not
> really changing in the configuration my preference for charset.  Take a
> look at .kde/share/config/kmailrc and search for 8859-15 strings.  I made a
> copy, then I removed some line(s) regarding the wrong charset, and I run
> again KMail, with success.

Hola David,

thanks. I will try, however, I would like to ask one question:
which one is the less problematic configuration with the charset?




Linux User 152692
PGP: 0xF944807E

Attachment: pgprNzQBeUQbf.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: