[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: KMail 1.9.1 header bug



A Dimarts 31 Gener 2006 11:35, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda va escriure:
> Dear Rino,

excuse me, I'm sorry, Rigo not Rino

Leo


>
> in the view part of the message there's an option to check (Identity). I
> have found that if I have not checked is option, and I copy the message to
> the draft folder, and I resend it, the from field is the original one, no
> mine.
>
> If I have this option activated, and I copy the message to the draft
> folder, then, the from field is changed to the default identity. I don't
> think that it's a bug.
>
> Regards,
>
> Leo
>
> A Dimarts 31 Gener 2006 10:54, Rigo Wenning va escriure:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > just experienced some unpleasant behavior of KMail 1.9.1 within Kontact
> > 1,2:
> >
> > I have an email from somebody that I have to work on. I copy the email to
> > the drafts folder. In the drafts folder, I says "T" for take-up. The
> > message shows (Default) as identity. I had not until now displayed the
> > From: - field.
> >
> > I edit the message and send it on to someone else.
> >
> > Now KMail -despite showing identity (Default)- is sending the email with
> > the From: of the initial From: - address of the message copied to the
> > drafts-folder. This caused some irritation at the receivers of that email
> > as you can imagine. I signed the message and the content did not
> > correspond to the From: indicated.
> >
> > Now if I edit the message and instead of sending it directly, I save it
> > again to the drafts-folder, the From: - address changed to my
> > email-address. If I take it up again with "T", everything is fine and it
> > can be sent with my email in From:
> >
> > Question: I wanted to send a bug report to KDE. Should I do that? And if
> > yes, should I file it against KMail or Kontact?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Rigo



Reply to: