Re: Komba.. (More reasons why it has to reap mounts)
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 05:15:57PM -0700, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> > Educate the users, then? They must have been educated enough to _mount_
> > the shares, why not unmount them?
>
> Hehehe I see you don't work in the real world.. I hear this often from Linux
> Developers, but in the real world hard enough to get them to follow simple
> rules. If they (average office user) can find a way to screw it up, assume
> they will :)
In most offices I have worked at IT setup the shares to automatically be
mounted in windows. The user didn't even know what a share was except of
course "the files I want are on drive T". The analogue of that on Linux
would be using automount (assuming it works with cifs/smbfs) to mount
the directories when the user looks at them. So it seems the use of
Komba in normal office environment would not even be needed or wanted,
since IT probably wouldn't want users trying to snoop around in various
other shares on the network.
Chris
Reply to: