Re: DDPD - the Dangerous Debian Package Dump - Was: Re: KDE PIM in sid?

To: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: DDPD - the Dangerous Debian Package Dump - Was: Re: KDE PIM in sid?
From: Thomas Ritter <th.ritter@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 20:59:49 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 200302192059.49411.th.ritter@gmx.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030219192334.GA734@bbnslab>
References: <[🔎] 200302190939.56160.mattsheffield@yahoo.com> <[🔎] 200302191701.02217.th.ritter@gmx.net> <[🔎] 20030219192334.GA734@bbnslab>

Am Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2003 20:23 schrieb Yun-Ta Tsai:
> Still...using unofficial debs or compiling myself is temporary choice.
> (My opinion)

This is what I meant this for. Like the kdepim packages.
and... broken dependency? dist-upgrade lost its function? Sounds like every 
KDE upgrade I made on Debian ;)

Thomas Ritter

Reply to:

References:
- KDE PIM in sid?
  - From: Matt Sheffield <mattsheffield@yahoo.com>
- DDPD - the Dangerous Debian Package Dump - Was: Re: KDE PIM in sid?
  - From: Thomas Ritter <th.ritter@gmx.net>
- Re: DDPD - the Dangerous Debian Package Dump - Was: Re: KDE PIM in sid?
  - From: Yun-Ta Tsai <bbns.csie91@nctu.edu.tw>

Prev by Date: libqt3 from Ralf
Next by Date: Re: libqt3 from Ralf
Previous by thread: Re: DDPD - the Dangerous Debian Package Dump - Was: Re: KDE PIM in sid?
Next by thread: Re: KDE PIM in sid?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread