Re: Memory Usage - KDE - Where is discussion on this?

To: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Memory Usage - KDE - Where is discussion on this?
From: Anders Ellenshøj Andersen <andersa@fys.ku.dk>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 10:12:02 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 200302161012.02711.andersa@fys.ku.dk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030216045851.GG7853@cheney.cx>
References: <[🔎] 200302150936.42592.michael@linuxmagic.com> <[🔎] 200302151410.20123.michael@linuxmagic.com> <[🔎] 20030216045851.GG7853@cheney.cx>

On Sunday 16 February 2003 05:58, Chris Cheney wrote:

> Comparing KDE 3.1 (plus Debian and the various daemons) to a operating
> system that is 7 years old isn't exactly fair. Otherwise why not compare

HEY! My Amiga1200-060 can multitask comfortably with just 16 MB Ram and I 
never run out of physical memory so I don't even need swap memory. Clearly 
KDE SUX!

Anders

-- 
This email was generated using KMail from KDE 3.1 (RC6) on Debian GNU/Linux

Reply to:

References:
- Memory Usage - KDE - Where is discussion on this?
  - From: Michael Peddemors <michael@linuxmagic.com>
- Re: Memory Usage - KDE - Where is discussion on this?
  - From: Michael Peddemors <michael@linuxmagic.com>
- Re: Memory Usage - KDE - Where is discussion on this?
  - From: Chris Cheney <ccheney@cheney.cx>

Prev by Date: Re: Memory Usage - KDE - Where is discussion on this?
Next by Date: Re: Sid KDE 3.1 upgrade report
Previous by thread: Re: Memory Usage - KDE - Where is discussion on this?
Next by thread: Re: Memory Usage - KDE - Where is discussion on this?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread