Re: environment question
...my first reply got lost, here it is again:
Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> Take a look at the end of config.log (hopefully it actually generates
> one) - configure gives this error whenever a test compile of Qt stuff
> goes wrong, but it doesn't mean that it can't actually find it. I have
> seen this error when, for instance, I'm compiling with g++-3.2 but the
> Qt libs are compiled with g++-2.95. Take a look at the error messages
> towards the end of config.log, and go from there.
and Ralf Nolden wrote:
> Please use the variables found in the respective admin dirs to compile.
> they're in $(configkde).
>
>
>>export KDEDIR=/usr/local/kde
>
> Not needed. libs are in /usr/lib, includes in /usr/include/kde
>
> Look up that stuff in admin/debianrules
Thanks, Ralf and Stephen.
The log didn't show more useful info but I checked once more the libs
and - shame on me - the libqt3-dev package was missing, I only had
libqt-dev installed. This notwithstanding the configuration issue
persisted but I could compile my app now with
export QTDIR=/usr/share/qt
export KDEDIR=/usr [wouldn't work without this line]
However, the toolbar button icons are missing. The app is kmlofax, a
mature program that I have been using while it evolved for years and
with icons.
- So I wonder what to do with this, and I still have the general question,
- what are others doing who are able to compile a program but do not
have the skill to find admin/debianrules and apply its information
accordingly? KDE help did not seem to point there at first glance, and I
was unsure whether I had to execute this perl script anyway.
$(configkde) is in docbook format the path of which I finally fed to my
browser with little joy over the result.
While I appreciate your help and especially your great packaging
efforts, Ralf, I want to pose the question to the list in general,
wouldn't it be nice to have some easy to find information for other
not-so-much-but-somewhat-skilled users to be able to compile KDE apps on
their Debian system.
Greetings,
Andreas
Reply to: