Re: [kde] setting an /opt precedent
On Thursday 17 January 2002 02:37 pm, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
<snip>
> For the record, I'm *not* saying that KDE should be installed in /opt. This
> is another matter, I'm saying that the reason for not installing into /opt
> cannot be "/opt violates FHS" since /opt is part of FHS, and its use is
> very clearly conveyed in the standard. I'd like to think that a native
> English speaker would not have so much difficulty in understanding two
> pages of text.
Then perhaps this discussion should continue on a policy list or in private,
since it's pretty off-topic for this list, by your own admission.
<snip>
> For people who are more seriously interested in the interpetation of FHS, I
> invite you to thoroughly read the standard and state your opinions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - --
> Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
> Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
> www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
> GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D
> 539C -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE8RygCfAeuFodNU5wRApgZAJ9JHFAFLC0z/DgTzn53ODqsIF4qUwCghqyy
> hfFVKamR+48M5hirLe29094=
> =83Uo
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: