[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Why did I suggest /usr/lib/kde3 or /opt/kde3? (Re: What are Chris and Daniel actually going to do now?)



On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 03:51:27PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> On Thursday 17 January 2002 01:24, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> >
> > That's all that is needed!!!!!
> 
> Something is left out. What do we do with binaries? I think binaries should 
> stay in /usr/lib/kde3/bin, and linked to /usr/bin. Maybe /usr/bin/X11 would 
> be an even better place. Would this be a good solution?

No.

Your original complaint was about cluttering the namespace. With this
solution, not only are you implementing TWO ugly hacks (the
/usr/lib/kde3 prefix and /usr/bin symlinks), but the namespace stays
"cluttered".

-- 
Daniel Stone						    <daniel@sfarc.net>
<Zxcfb> apt, karma dpkg
<apt> dpkg has karma of 1
<dpkg> apt: '640K ought to be enough for anybody.' - Bill Gates, 1981
<apt> dpkg: bugger all, i dunno
<dpkg> apt: The name is Baud......., James Baud
<apt> ...but name is already something else...

Attachment: pgpHpyFeGuRJE.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: