[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: KDE filesystem structure



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi David,

On Wednesday 16 January 2002 00:23, David Bishop wrote:
>
> If you re-read what I said, I was complaining about how KDE uses that
> approach: everything in the same directory.  IOW, I already understand how
> it works, and even partly why, but don't like it :-)  I would *like* to be
> able to have a debianized kde "base" system, and also be able to compile
> *some* apps locally (kpilot in particular) without having to worry about
> conflicts. IOW, the /usr prefix is fine, I just want /usr/local to work as
> well B-) Now, as I have not volunteered to get off my buttocks and figure
> out a clean way to achieve this goal, let alone actually *doing* it, all I
> can do is offer my opinion accompanied by smilies...  I obviously like KDE
> (and debian!), so this isn't a showstopper for me, but it sure would be
> nice...

I suggest you to develop your own applications with your own KDE build, 
that's how (almost) all KDE hackers work.

OTOH, you can have a debianized kde base system and be able to compile apps 
locally.

You can install your applications to /usr/local rather easily making use of 
KDEDIRS environment variable (which must be set prior to starting KDE of 
course). I maintain both a /usr/local (for KDE 2 apps) and /usr/local/kde3 
for my KDE3 coding.

However, the best is to develop for KDE3, and then write a simple packaging 
script for debian so installing it on a debian system is a snap.

Thanks,

- -- 
Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B  EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8RRUVfAeuFodNU5wRAni3AJ0d3N5lDBQmrrF0mnjwAH+TqUbHdwCgk94O
0I0PWznG1ozwzCZhel2Ikjk=
=hvJZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: