Re: Yet another anti-aliased KDE screenshot
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 30 October 2001 05:48, Daniel Robert Franklin wrote:
> So, in short, if you actually want to see the font, as opposed to a bunch
> of artifacts, you need to use anti-aliasing. Don't mistake smoothness for
> blurring.
That was some nice explanation. Anti-aliasing is something you ought to
integrate in any display system, or you will have jagged edges. Thus, some of
the hype associated with Mac OS X's Carbon.
I'd always thought anti-aliasing was simply resampling, tho'. Which means
there is actually some blending but not blurring, most algorithms are careful
enough not to degrade image quality. On the other hand, the end result varies
since there are different algorithms.
I find the KDE AA satisfactory on XFree86, tho. The fonts look good on a
hi-res display. I think that was one advantage Windoze had, only until
recently :)
If you're viewing that screenshot with konqueror you will see a fairly
accurate representation of what I'm using but if you use an image viewer that
resamples that further for you, it will indeed look blurry.
My feeling is that especially web pages look a lot more like they were
intended to.
So, could you tell me about your font settings?
Thanks,
- --
Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7305UfAeuFodNU5wRAqD7AJ9xywomgvSmb1qi3IGyuFY6748ImgCffRca
bR8zwWcVmFx4V5tjLgT6o40=
=E+Ea
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: