[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: To: John Gay

On Thursday 31 May 2001 04:02, Scott E. Graves wrote:
> First of all, 90% of the time woody is broken. If it's a
> leading-edge dist you're looking for, use sid. Your system coulkd
> be rendered useless ussing the woody tree.

But woody is sid + a couple of of (critical?) bug-free days. Woody 
should in principle be more stable than sid. Only problem I see is 
the security updates.

Reply to: