Re: [debian-jr] Re: Live CD as a focal point for reviving Jr development
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 13:44 -0700, Bill Kendrick wrote:
> <snip>
> > The only reason why Gnome now seems more viable than it used to is
> > because of all the support in the desktop environment for out-of-the-box
> > USB devices.
>
> I think KDE does, too, or is close. I guess it depends on what exactly
> Gnome is _doing_ with the devices.
It's magic trickery to be sure... I never could figure it all out. All I
know is it worked extremely well with just about any USB device I
plugged in.
> > Things like that just working in the classroom is a very
> > nice thing. Also, Gnome is more obfuscated so it can be harder to tweak
> > and customize than KDE, and it has a more limited interface (both of
> > which are ideal for the classroom).
>
> I guess that's why I don't like Gnome. They got rid of the "Apply" button
> in config screens! YIKES! <:^(
Again... a more limited interface is much better for children and
especially in classroom or educational environments. Personally... I
wouldn't use Gnome myself... but I can't deny I've seen it is very
successful with people who get confused with everything available to
them in other WM/DEs.
> > Remember, we're not talking about environments we like to use (if we
> > were, I'd be advocating using Fluxbox or Ratpoison in the classroom :-)
> > We're talking about what provides a simple-enough interface as to not
> > cause confusion, and yet gives them the most functionality for their
> > buck.
>
> Of course. Depending on the age group, something like Apple's old
> "Launcher" would be appropriate. Older kids would probably enjoy something
> tweakable like KDE (or Gnome), too.
There was also some talk LOONG ago (in a now vanished t4k list) of a
really simple app launcher for children. Something that would be ideal
for K-5 children.
Heh... if memory serves me correctly, Bill I think you were the one who
wanted to make it :-)
--
'''''''''''''''''''''''''
.O. Sam Hart, sam@progeny.com
..O Progeny Linux Systems, Inc
OOO <http://www.progeny.com/>
Reply to: