[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Moving JTS 1.13 to unstable, h2database & elasticsearch need changes



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 10-11-15 17:33, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 07.11.2015 um 16:46 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg:
>> JTS 1.13 has been available in experimental for some time now,
>> and I'd like to move it to unstable soon. We have GEOS 3.5.0 in
>> unstable for some time too, but JTS 1.13 it's a port of is not in
>> unstable yet.
>> 
>> Because the two libjts-java reverse dependencies are both
>> maintained by the Java team, I'd like to coordinate the jts
>> transition with the h2database & elasticsearch maintainers.
>> 
>> The h2database won't need 04-jts-compatibility.patch any more,
>> upstream already uses JTS 1.13 for its builds.
>> 
>> Because jts (1.13+ds-1~exp1) now uses maven-debian-helper,
>> elasticsearch doesn't need to install the jar manually any more.
>> 
>> Patches for both are attached.
>> 
>> If we can coordinate the transition on this list we can spare us
>> two RC bugs when JTS 1.13 is uploaded to unstable.
> 
> thanks for the heads-up. I think elasticsearch isn't critical since
> it won't be part of the next stable release anyway. [1] I can apply
> the patch for h2database. Just go ahead with your upload.

jts (1.13+ds-1) has just been uploaded to unstable.

I'll file a bug for elasticsearch with the patch too.

Kind Regards,

Bas

- -- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=IgWf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: