Am 31.10.2015 um 15:46 schrieb Luca Vercelli: [...] >> Now I am wondering whether it would be ok to package 2.3.5 straight away, or >> does Eclipse strictly depend on 2.3.4? > > Well, I'm not sure of this, but I think 2.3.5 will be fine. > Also, w.r.t. the old package sat4j, it didn't put any link in > /usr/share/maven-repo. (I just created these links for myself using mvn > install). > > Thank you > Luca I would go for the latest release. I agree that adding maven artifacts to sat4j is useful. Please upload new revisions of packages to http://mentors.debian.net/. http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers and ask for a review on this list. Is sat4j 2.3.5 also compatible with the current version of Eclipse? Then we can upload the package straight to unstable, otherwise I suggest to use the experimental distribution for now. >> Also: I'd be more than happy to have share sat4j maintenance. >> >> Best, >> Michael Why not maintain sat4j as part of the Java team? It's no guarantee that the maintenance effort will automatically drop to zero but some bugs can be fixed more efficiently. Cheers, Markus
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature