[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: plans for eclipse luna in debian

Am 31.10.2015 um 15:46 schrieb Luca Vercelli:
>> Now I am wondering whether it would be ok to package 2.3.5 straight away, or
>> does Eclipse strictly depend on 2.3.4?
> Well, I'm not sure of this, but I think 2.3.5 will be fine.
> Also, w.r.t. the old package sat4j, it didn't put any link in
> /usr/share/maven-repo. (I just created these links for myself using mvn
> install).
> Thank you
> Luca

I would go for the latest release. I agree that adding maven artifacts
to sat4j is useful. Please upload new revisions of packages to


and ask for a review on this list. Is sat4j 2.3.5 also compatible with
the current version of Eclipse? Then we can upload the package straight
to unstable, otherwise I suggest to use the experimental distribution
for now.

>> Also: I'd be more than happy to have share sat4j maintenance.
>> Best,
>> Michael

Why not maintain sat4j as part of the Java team? It's no guarantee that
the maintenance effort will automatically drop to zero but some bugs can
be fixed more efficiently.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: