[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New guy with some questions



Am 06.09.2015 um 04:34 schrieb dean:
> Greetings debian-java,
> 
> I'm an 'amateur' java/debian hacker. My goal is to put together a debian
> package for freenet[0] and eventually get it uploaded to the debian
> repo(very long term goal). Freenet depends on a few different / old /
> obselete pieces of code which will make this project difficult / fun
> ;-). The package has been built long ago so i have something to base it
> on[1].

Hello dean,

welcome to Debian Java.

> Firstly freenet depends on bouncycastle 1.52 with stable,testing and
> unstable having 1.49 and experimental having 1.51. Is there any way I
> can assist getting 1.52 uploaded to debian? Should I file a feature
> request bug and work with the maintainer that way?

Filing a wishlist bug report against bouncycastle and setting yourself
as the owner of that bug is a good way to avoid double work and to
inform people you are working on something. It is probably not too hard
to use the experimental package as a base and upgrade to 1.52. The time
consuming part is to check if all reverse-dependencies still build from
source with 1.52 and to fix all those packages which are possibly broken
with the latest version.


> Secondly package libbcprov-java-doc is supposed to install the api docs
> but does not actually contain the the documentation. Should i file a bug
> for this too?

Indeed this looks like a bug. libbcpg-java-doc does not contain any
javadoc either.

> Is this as simple as including the javadoc's in the git
> repo and building the package?

We always build the javadoc from source, so it is a matter of getting
debian/rules right. You could try to rebuild the package and figure out
why the documentation is missing. I can see there are different install
targets which are supposed to move the documentation into the
corresponding doc packages. Obviously two of them do not work as expected.

> I am not asking for the community to work for me, I am happy to do the
> legwork and get involved but I will need some advice, a push in the
> right direction and possibly some hand holding.

Thanks for your interest in packaging Java software for Debian.

Regards,

Markus



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: