On 07/09/15 00:24, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 06.09.2015 um 04:34 schrieb dean: > > Hello dean, > > welcome to Debian Java. > Thank you. > Filing a wishlist bug report against bouncycastle and setting yourself > as the owner of that bug is a good way to avoid double work and to > inform people you are working on something. It is probably not too hard > to use the experimental package as a base and upgrade to 1.52. The time > consuming part is to check if all reverse-dependencies still build from > source with 1.52 and to fix all those packages which are possibly broken > with the latest version. > I will get to this shortly. >> Secondly package libbcprov-java-doc is supposed to install the api docs >> but does not actually contain the the documentation. Should i file a bug >> for this too? > > Indeed this looks like a bug. libbcpg-java-doc does not contain any > javadoc either. > >> Is this as simple as including the javadoc's in the git >> repo and building the package? > > We always build the javadoc from source, so it is a matter of getting > debian/rules right. You could try to rebuild the package and figure out > why the documentation is missing. I can see there are different install > targets which are supposed to move the documentation into the > corresponding doc packages. Obviously two of them do not work as expected. > I just built libbcprov-java-doc from source with debuild and the doc's were generated and installed. There were some doc errors but it worked. I'll investigate further and report back. > > Thanks for your interest in packaging Java software for Debian. > > Regards, > > Markus >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature